Statement from the Autism Society of Japan
The Autism Society of Japan (ASJ) has released a statement regarding the planned animation adaptation of NENE AZUKI's manga "Mii-chan to Yamada-san," expressing concerns particularly about the depiction of people with disabilities. This statement is based on the interpretation that, although the character Mii-chan is not explicitly stated to have a disability, her depiction and comments from the author suggest she could be interpreted as having intellectual or developmental disabilities.
Issues with "Mii-chan"
ASJ indicated that the term "Mii-chan" is recognized as being used to mock children with disabilities. They referenced comments made on August 19 by the Nationwide Association for the Development of People Holding Hands, expressing concerns that the use of this nickname serves as material for bullying individuals with intellectual disabilities. Additionally, they reported receiving feedback from siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder about worries regarding teasing at school.
Economic Interests and Ethical Concerns
The statement also mentioned the commercial exploitation of the actual hardships faced by sex workers, the impoverished, and people with disabilities as depicted in the manga. Particularly, the "light" portrayal of Mii-chan was criticized for using her tragedy as a form of entertainment. The phrases expressed by editors in the video, such as "wanting to see Mii-chan suffer" and "wanting to see the darkness of this world," were also flagged as problematic, potentially undermining the original purpose of the story.
ASJ stated that while the depiction of Mii-chan and Yamada encourages empathy, it may also lead to discomfort by portraying extremely vulnerable people.
Position Against Animation
ASJ ultimately declared opposition to the animation of "Mii-chan to Yamada-san." Even if age and broadcast restrictions are applied, they believe the animation is inappropriate. Criticism of the manga has raised concerns about future animation productions, emphasizing that works potentially mocking people with disabilities and their families should be used as a means to deepen understanding rather than for commercial gain.
